The Delhi High Court recently ruled that an employment agreement signed by a deceased inventor serves as a valid ‘Proof of Right’ document, overturning the Patent Office’s rejection. This decision in Nippon Steel Corporation v. Controller of Patents clarifies procedural requirements for corporate patent applicants. It emphasizes substance over hyper-technical form, in establishing ownership during […]
Tag: IPO
India- High Court reminds the Indian Patent Office to issue reasoned decisions/orders
In Regeneron Pharmaceuticals v Controller of Patents and Designs ((T)CMA(PT) No.191 of 2023), the Madras High Court set-aside an order passed by the Indian Patent Office (‘IPO’) on the grounds of lack of sufficient reasoning and absence of a speaking order.. Consequently, the matter was remanded back to the IPO for consideration afresh. Background: The […]
Novartis v. Natco Pharma Limited - Patent Examination and Opposition proceedings under the Patents Act are ‘Parallel but Independent’, says Delhi High Court
In the case of Novartis Ag v. Natco Pharma Limited & Anr., a Division Bench of the Delhi High Court (in LPA 50/2023,) clarified that the process of substantive examination of a patent application and a pre-grant opposition proceeding are two separate and independent processes/proceedings, and that the opponent has no right to intervene in […]
India- Non-attendance at patent hearings cannot tantamount to abandonment
In Star Scientific Limited v. The Controller of Patents and Designs, C.A.(COMM.IPD-PAT) 20/2024, the Delhi High Court reversed the decision of the Controller of Patents and Designs which had rejected patent application no. 202017011947 on the ground that the Applicant/ Appellant did not attend the pre-scheduled hearing (and consequently, that all the objections raised raised […]