INDIA- JUDICIAL CLARIFICATION ON SECTION 3(e) VS SECTION 3(d)- ORAMED LTD. vs THE CONTROLLER GENERAL OF PATENTS AND DESIGNS

In a recent ruling concerning pharmaceutical patents, the Calcutta High Court set aside a decision by the Controller of Patents for erroneously conflating the distinct legal standards for patentability of an invention. The judgment underscores ongoing concerns regarding inconsistencies in the examination of pharmaceutical composition claims, particularly where the statutory criteria are misapplied. Facts: The […]