Publications

Therapeutic Efficacy: A Prerequisite for Novel Intermediates- Delhi High Court ruling in Zeria Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. v. the Controller of Patents

The Delhi High Court dismissed Zeria Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd.’s (the ‘Appellant’) appeal against the Controller of Patents' (the ‘Respondent’) refusal order of a divisional patent application (3630/DLNP/2011). The ruling focused on a novel intermediate compound rejected for lack of inventive step and for failing to demonstrate enhanced therapeutic efficacy. Case Background  Zeria filed a divisional […]

Breaking the Algorithmic Silence: Ab Initio's Path to CRI Patent Triumph

The Madras High Court, in a landmark ruling, in Ab Initio Technology LLC (‘Ab Initio’) v. The Controller of Patents & Designs, overturned the Patent Office's rejection of a computer-related invention (‘CRI’) application titled “Graphic Representations of Data Relationship.” This decision mandates the grant of the patent (application no. 4693/CHENP/2010), citing clear novelty and inventive step […]

Nepal – An Update on Pending Trademark Applications

Background Sometime on or about 19 August 2025, Nepalese Trademarks Registry issued a notice requiring actions as follows: For trade marks registered before 19 August 2025 and within 7-Year renewal period, all trade mark proprietors must submit evidence of use within 60 days from the date of publication. For Pending Applications Applications which remain pending […]

IndiaMart vs. Puma: Navigating Intellectual Property Rights and Intermediary Responsibility in the Digital Era

The Delhi High Court’s ruling in Puma v. IndiaMart Intermesh, 2025 SCC Online Del 4165, provides a significant analysis of the connection between Indian trademark law and intermediary liability in the context of online marketplaces. The case arose from allegations that IndiaMart, a business-to-business listing platform, facilitated the sale of counterfeit Puma products. It was […]

Thailand – Updates to Trademark E-Filing System

The Department of Intellectual Property (DIP) has rolled out changes to its Trademark E-Filing System, as of 29 September 2025. These updates address common filing issues, enhance system integration, and strengthen user authentication. Trademark Image Uploads To prevent errors in official forms, the system will no longer accept trademark images uploaded with transparent backgrounds and […]

India’s 2025 CRI Guidelines: A New Era for Software and AI Patent Examination

India has ushered in a transformative phase in its intellectual property regime with the release of the 2025 Guidelines for the Examination of Computer-Related Inventions (CRIs). Issued by the Office of the Controller General of Patents, Designs & Trademarks (CGPDTM) on July 29, 2025, these guidelines mark a significant evolution in how software and artificial […]

Calcutta High Court Overturns Patent Rejection: Clarifies Standards for Morality and Public Health Exclusions

The Calcutta High Court’s judgment, in ITC Limited v. The Controller General of Patents Designs and Trademarks (IPDPTA/13/2024) marked a crucial development in Indian patent law by overturning the rejection of ITC’s patent application (No. 685/KOL/2015) for “a device and method to generate and deliver a nicotine aerosol”. The case centered on Section 3(b) of […]

INDIA- JUDICIAL CLARIFICATION ON SECTION 3(e) VS SECTION 3(d)- ORAMED LTD. vs THE CONTROLLER GENERAL OF PATENTS AND DESIGNS

In a recent ruling concerning pharmaceutical patents, the Calcutta High Court set aside a decision by the Controller of Patents for erroneously conflating the distinct legal standards for patentability of an invention. The judgment underscores ongoing concerns regarding inconsistencies in the examination of pharmaceutical composition claims, particularly where the statutory criteria are misapplied. Facts: The […]

Case summary of Symphony Holdings Limited v Skins IP Limited [2025] SGIPOS 3

I. Background Symphony Holdings Limited v. Skins IP Limited [2025] SGIPOS 3 concerned an opposition by Symphony Holdings Limited (the “Opponent”) against an application by Skins IP Limited (the “Applicant”) to register the following word trade mark, “SKINS”, (the “Subject Mark”) in Singapore. The Opponent, a Hong Kong-based sports-branding company, opposed the application based on […]